Huge win for car owners! All TSBs to be made public. The Center for Auto Safety just made the NHTSA (US Government) make public the full text of all TSBs from now on. They are the same organization that has petitioned the NHTSA & filed lawsuits to protect car owners over exploding gas tanks & other major safety issues. Whenever you drive in your car, you are safer thanks in part to a lot of work over the years by this small but very effective consumer advocacy group.

Please take a moment & say thank you by donating $5 or whatever you can to the Center for Auto Safety.

NHTSA — Suspension: Front: Macpherson Strut Problems


hardly worth mentioning
Crashes / Fires:
0 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
84,000 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

This data is from the NHTSA — the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints are spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem.

So how do you find out what problems are occurring? For this NHTSA complaint data, the only way is to read through the comments below. Any duplicates or errors? It's not us.

2002 Pontiac Grand Prix suspension problems

suspension problem

Find something helpful? Spread the word.
Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2002 Pontiac Grand Prix:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

2002 Pontiac Grand Prix Owner Comments

problem #1

Nov 172005

Grand Prix 6-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 84,000 miles


This is an update to complaint 10107847. Please include the following information with the previous summary. In addition to the parts previously mentioned, at approximately 84,000 miles, the front struts and their associated mounts required replacement due to excessive wear. Indications were first noticed from a light tapping from the strut mount on passenger side, followed by the drivers side. Removal and inspection of the struts and mounts revealed that the strut mounts had literally melted around the metal top bushing at the point of attachment of the vulcanized rubber. Although it deformed and separated from the rubber, the mount provisions retained the parts sufficiently enough to prevent inadvertent release or other abnomalies except for the tapping sound it made. The strut assemblies lost their dampening on the upstroke side and were weak on the down or compression side (typical strut).

- Chadds Ford, PA, USA

Not what you are looking for?