Huge win for car owners! All TSBs to be made public. The Center for Auto Safety just made the NHTSA (US Government) make public the full text of all TSBs from now on. They are the same organization that has petitioned the NHTSA & filed lawsuits to protect car owners over exploding gas tanks & other major safety issues. Whenever you drive in your car, you are safer thanks in part to a lot of work over the years by this small but very effective consumer advocacy group.

Please take a moment & say thank you by donating $5 or whatever you can to the Center for Auto Safety.

NHTSA — Suspension: Front: Macpherson Strut Problems

5.7

fairly significant
Crashes / Fires:
0 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
15,000 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

This data is from the NHTSA — the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints are spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem.

So how do you find out what problems are occurring? For this NHTSA complaint data, the only way is to read through the comments below. Any duplicates or errors? It's not us.

2006 Pontiac Grand Prix suspension problems

suspension problem

Find something helpful? Spread the word.
Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2006 Pontiac Grand Prix:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

2006 Pontiac Grand Prix Owner Comments

problem #1

May 112007

Grand Prix 8-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 15,000 miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

This is a cumulative failure. The failure and failure modes are identical to the GTO failure currently under investigation NHTSA action number: PE07010. Make: Pontiac, model GTO, 2006. Component : suspension:front: Mcpherson strut. Tires:sidewall. Date investigation opened : February 16, 2007 and still open. ODI received 69 complaints that alleged a front strut to tire interference condition in model year 2004 through 2006 Pontiac GTO vehicles. The complaints indicated that the condition caused inner sidewall wear to the tires. Seven of the complainants alleged tire failure caused by the interference condition of the strut to the adjacent tire. Four of these complainants claimed they were traveling at speeds of 40 mph or greater when the tire failed. One of these complainants also stated the tire failure caused a crash. A preliminary evaluation was opened to assess the frequency, scope, and potential safety implications of the alleged defect.

- Grain Valley , MO, USA

Not what you are looking for?