Huge win for car owners! All TSBs to be made public. The Center for Auto Safety just made the NHTSA (US Government) make public the full text of all TSBs from now on. They are the same organization that has petitioned the NHTSA & filed lawsuits to protect car owners over exploding gas tanks & other major safety issues. Whenever you drive in your car, you are safer thanks in part to a lot of work over the years by this small but very effective consumer advocacy group.

Please take a moment & say thank you by donating $5 or whatever you can to the Center for Auto Safety.

CarComplaints.com Notes: A dependable pickup option that does have a slight history of frame corrosion. Even though mud looks cool on a truck, it's best if you run this through the car wash every now and again.

2.9

hardly worth mentioning
Crashes / Fires:
0 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
48,270 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

This data is from the NHTSA — the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints are spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem.

So how do you find out what problems are occurring? For this NHTSA complaint data, the only way is to read through the comments below. Any duplicates or errors? It's not us.

2003 Toyota Tundra suspension problems

suspension problem

Find something helpful? Spread the word.
Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2003 Toyota Tundra:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

2003 Toyota Tundra Owner Comments

problem #1

Jul 182008

Tundra

  • 48,270 miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

The contact owns a 2003 Toyota Tundra. The contact received a recall notice for NHTSA campaign id number 05V225000 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint). He scheduled an appointment with the dealer to have the vehicle repaired when the parts arrived. The recall repair was performed on August 24, 2005. When the vehicle was taken to a different dealer for another failure, it was discovered that the vehicle had an outstanding repair for the ball joints. The contact was informed that the first dealer only inspected the ball joints instead of replace them as stated on Toyota's website. The dealer advised him to go to the original dealer that performed the recall inspection. The dealer then scheduled a second appointment for the recall repair, but when he arrived for the repair, he was informed that the repair work had been performed the first time. Currently, the records indicate that the repair work had been performed, which is incorrect. The failure mileage was 48,270.

- Houston, TX, USA

Search CarComplaints.com for these popular complaint phrases...

Not what you are looking for?