Dodge Dakota 1999 ball joints failure. Consumer wants to know why wouldn't a recall be issued on the 97-99 like for the 2000-03 models, for the durango/Dakota's. the consumer stated the upper and lower ball joints were replaced twice on the passenger side and has failed again.

- Washington, DC, USA

Dodge Dakota 1999 ball joints failed and had to be replaced. Consumer wants to know why wouldn't a recall be issued on the 98 -99 not just the 2000-2005 models. The consumer stated that the manifold bolts snapped off in the engine compartment and they needed to be removed.

- Washington, DC, USA

63000miles and upper ball joint dry and squeaking. Found urethane seal deteriorated allowing water/salt intrusion and purging of grease. Why not detected in vehicle testing"?" will repair myself with prepped aftermarket components thank you very much

- Southfield, MI, USA

At 46,000 miles the ball joints failed. There was grinding in the right front side of the vehicle. Had to have the tie rods and wheel bearings replaced.

- Munising, MI, USA

2 lower ball joints, 2 upper ball joints and 2 inner tie rods all replaced at 48,600 miles in 2/02. New recall only covers 2000-2004 Dakotas when it is obvious that the 1999 model should also be covered. Reimbursement from Chrysler for parts/labor/alignment at $806 for defective parts should be expected.

- Worcester, MA, USA

The consumer experienced problems with the upper ball joints as well as having to replace the upper control arms on both sides. The owner took the vehicle to the dealer and had the services performed. Provide further details.

- Des Moines, IA, USA

We have a 1999 Dodge Dakota that was riding rough. After driving another vehicle, and then driving the Dakota you would notice that the smoothness was gone, and when going over any uneven pavement or bumpy roads you really had to grip the steering wheel to have control. Took the vehicle in for inspection and ended up having the upper and lower ball joints replaced. The vehicle had 44,000 miles on it. The replacement took care of the problem with an out of pocket cost of $633.

- Ludington, MI, USA

"recall campaign 04V596000" concerning ball joints: Consumer stated the ball joints disintegrated completely. Consumer contacted the dealership and manufacturer. However, the problem still exists.

- Louisville, KY, USA

The upper ball joints are wearing out prematurely and need to be replaced. The cause has yet to be determined.......the truck wa sonly driven on road, very low mileage for ball joint failure. 150 other complaints in NHTSA data base on same issue.

- East Greenwich, RI, USA

1. front suspension making clunking noises. Tires cupping. Steering felt loose.. I didnt allow the failure to occur.. replaced upper and lower ball joints.

- Burlington, WI, USA

I believe the ball joints on my 1999 Dodge Dakota 5.2L V8 were defective. I had alignment problems and was told the ball joints were bad (both upper and lower) and needed replacement. Had I not gotten this fixed, the wheel may have eventually fallen off, resulting in injury or even death. The vehicle had approximately 54,500 miles on it at the time and the ball joints were replaced on 12-01-04. I believe that the recall already in effect for Dodge durango and Dakotas 2000-2005, should be extended back to at least TO1999, as they are likely using the same defective parts.

- Bemidji, MN, USA

Upper ball joint bad after less than 61,000 miles on my 1999 Dodge Dakota. There was no crash or injury as a result.

- Tarentum, PA, USA

Consumer heard a clicking noise when making turns and at low speeds, making it difficult to control vehicle. Consumer took vehicle to dealer for upper ball joints repairs twice.

- Bradley, IL, USA

Consumer complained about upper and lower ball joints problem. When driving there was a clanking noise. Could hear it when pulling in and out of parking spaces. Consumer contacted the manufacturer, and was told that the recall for these vehicles were between the years 2000 to 2003. They will not make an exception.

- Delta, PA, USA

1999 Dodge Dakota with 27355 miles - front wheels about to fall off, had to replace upper ball joints - cost to me at the dealer was $484.38. I am the original owner and purchased the vehicle new. I think it's absurd to have to have ball joints replaced with those few miles - have never had to have that done with other vehicles owned with more mileage. I think the manufacturer should have replaced faulty items at no cost to the owner. Front wheels susceptible to falling off - I think would be a major concern to the manufacturer and the NHTSA.

- Grand Island, NY, USA

All four ball joints were replaced. However, the problem recurred. Contacted Dodge, and was not willing to assist the consumer with fixing the vehicle....mechanic notified consumer that one of the upper ball joints was defective to the point the wheel was in danger of breaking off at the ball joint.

- Anchorage, AK, USA

Vehicle experienced problems with the upper and lower ball joints. Consumer had the vehicle inspected, and discovered that both the upper and lower ball joints split. Both the upper and lower ball joints were replaced. Later, consumer contacted the manufacturer, who informed consumer that this vehicle was not recalled due to VIN.

- Parma, OH, USA

Consumer complained about upper ball joint problem. After hearing noise consumer took the vehicle to the dealer, and was informed that the ball joints were busted and needed immediate replacement. The service technician stated that he never saw ball joints in that condition before......

- Madison, OH, USA

Is the 1999 going to be included on the ball joint recall? I allready replaced one, , now I got another going out. Replaced tires on the front twice.

- Evansville, IN, USA

Front end wear causing erratic handling and excessive tire wear. Replaced all four ball joints (upper and lower) on 3/1/2004 at a cost of $777.14. Excess tire wear reduced useful life of front tires by 20,000 miles. Replaced tires on 12/31/2004 at a cost of $547.09.

- Taylor Ridge, IL, USA