Huge win for car owners! All TSBs to be made public. The Center for Auto Safety just made the NHTSA (US Government) make public the full text of all TSBs from now on. They are the same organization that has petitioned the NHTSA & filed lawsuits to protect car owners over exploding gas tanks & other major safety issues. Whenever you drive in your car, you are safer thanks in part to a lot of work over the years by this small but very effective consumer advocacy group.

Please take a moment & say thank you by donating $5 or whatever you can to the Center for Auto Safety.

1.9

hardly worth mentioning
Crashes / Fires:
0 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
83,500 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

This data is from the NHTSA — the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints are spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem.

So how do you find out what problems are occurring? For this NHTSA complaint data, the only way is to read through the comments below. Any duplicates or errors? It's not us.

2006 Ford Ranger engine problems

engine problem

Find something helpful? Spread the word.
Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2006 Ford Ranger:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

2006 Ford Ranger Owner Comments

problem #6

Dec 172015

Ranger

  • 20,000 miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

Fuel inertial cut-off switch activates randomly, usually once or twice a year. Result is sudden unexpected loss of engine power. Can happen while driving in town or on the freeway. Does not matter if the vehicle is moving fast or slow. The device can be reset by pushing a button but the device is not accessible from the drivers side while driving. Dangerous as the loss of power is total, immediate, and without warning. The is currently no recall for this item but I see from your website and other websites that this problem has happened to other people.

- Edgewater, MD, USA

problem #5

Sep 222014

Ranger

  • 128,000 miles
2006 Ford Ranger V6 3.0 biggest problem. Multiple cylinder misfire. Replaced multiple parts already nothing has worked. Engine code showing misfire in cylinder 4,5,6. multiple misfires. Looked online many others with the same problem.

- Cutler Bay, FL, USA

problem #4

Mar 312014

Ranger 6-cyl

  • 98,000 miles
Rough idle noticed while stopped at an intersection. Catastrophic misfire upon acceleration through an intersection. Truck was only able to "limp" 5 or less miles per hour. Check engine light had been turning off and on however diagnostics showed misfire for unknown reasons. Spark plugs and wires had been replaced twice within a year as well. Defected head manufactured by Ford.

- Encinitas, CA, USA

problem #3

Mar 082012

Ranger

  • 95,000 miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

Runs rough at stop. Hesitates when accelerates. Could cause accident at intersections. Valve recession problem as described in Ford issued tsb.

- Portland , TN, USA

problem #2

Mar 012013

Ranger 6-cyl

  • miles
2006 Ford Ranger. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle defective cylinder heads. The consumer stated according to Ford technical service bulletin 05-26-3 the engines were built at the factory with defective heads. If the check engine light illuminated, the heads needed to be replaced, as it was explained to him by a mechanic at a Ford dealership. The consumer stated it appeared to be defective materials in the heads, which required the heads to be removed and scrapped, along with the head gaskets. The heads appeared to be made of soft iron, where the base metal was perhaps not heat treated. The estimates for the repair of the engine, were between $3,000-$6,000 depending on what was needed to fix the problem.

- Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA

problem #1

Jan 242012

Ranger

  • 160,000 miles
The contact owns a 2006 Ford Ranger. The contact stated that while driving 45 mph the engine misfired, causing the vehicle to rough idle and stall. The contact took the vehicle to a local mechanic for diagnostic testing. The test results concluded that the vehicle needed a tune-up. The tune-up was performed however, the failure was not corrected. The contact took the vehicle back to the local mechanic where a second diagnostic was performed, concluding that the vehicle was in need of a tune-up. The vehicle was not further serviced. The failure mileage was 160,000.

- Leoma, TN, USA

Not what you are looking for?