2013 Land Rover Range Rover body / paint NHTSA complaints: Structure:Body

NHTSA — Structure: Body Problems


really awful
Crashes / Fires:
1 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
20,250 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

This data is from the NHTSA — the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints are spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem.

So how do you find out what problems are occurring? For this NHTSA complaint data, the only way is to read through the comments below. Any duplicates or errors? It's not us.

2013 Land Rover Range Rover body / paint problems

body / paint problem

Find something helpful? Spread the word.
Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Owner Comments

problem #2

Aug 152016

Range Rover

  • 40,500 miles


Land Rover part # knb 500023, listed as knb 500080 in the Range rover kit accessory booklet is for a tow hitch, that has a high failure rate. Filed case with Land Rover and they refuse to correct part under their Land Rover protection plan in force. The unique part male end is inserted into a female integrated part of the chassi and together forms a 2" X 2" class III capable of towning 77016 # with a tongue weight of 550# as imprinted or forged on the Land Rover part. There are cases on record in other countries that there is a high degree of failure rate when the vehicle is towing trailers according to the manufacture specification. So report that the locking system, does not latch full and reports of these 5# part will fall off while the vehicle is in motion. I have had two failure on towing and consider this a highway safety issue subject to immediate recall.

- Ormond Beach, FL, USA

problem #1

Dec 152014

Range Rover

  • miles
The contact was a body shop owner and was doing front end repairs on a 2013 Land Rover Range rover. The contact stated that the vehicle was traveling 5 mph in a driveway at the time of the incident. The contact stated that the vehicle had severe damage for a very minor accident. The contact stated that the manufacturer did not have the part for the contact to order. The minor incident caused the front end driver side shock tower to break away from the vehicle. The contact stated that the way the front end was made, the damage should have been a minimum of $2,500 instead of $50,000. The manufacturer stated that they did not have a repair for most of the damage the vehicle suffered from the incident. The failure mileage was unknown.

- Darien, CT, USA

Search CarComplaints.com for these popular complaint phrases...

Not what you are looking for?